References

Albert, S. and de Ruiter, J.P. (2018). Repair: The interface between interaction and cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10, 279-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12339

Antaki, C. (2008 ). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy(pp. 26– 42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.  

Antaki, C., Barnes, R. & Leudar, I. (2007). Members’ and analysts’ interests: “Formulations” and “interpretations” in psychotherapy. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins (Eds.) Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction (pp. 166–181). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,

Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies,7(6), 627– 647.  

Antaki, C. & Jahoda, A. (2010). Psychotherapists’ practices in keeping a session “on-track” in the face of clients’ “off-track” talk. Communication & Medicine, 7(1), 11–21

Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro, M. (2008). Clients’ responses to therapists’ reinterpretations. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy(pp. 43– 61). Cambridge University Press.

Burford-Rice, R. & Augoustinos, M. (2018) “I didn’t mean that. It was just a slip of the tongue”: Racial slips and gaffes in the public arena. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 21-42.

Church, A., Paatsch, L. & Toe, D. (2017), Some trouble with repair: conversations between children with cochlear implants and hearing peers, Discourse Studies, 19(1), 49-68, doi: 10.1177/1461445616683592.

Davis,K. (1986). The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 8 (1), 44– 74.

Drew, P. (2003). Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch. In P. J. Glenn, C.D. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp.293–308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ekberg, Katie, LeCouteur, Amanda, 2014. Co-implicating and re-shaping clients’ suggestions for behavioural change in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11 (1), 60-77.

Ekberg, K., & LeCouteur, A. (2015). Clients’resistance to therapists’ proposals: Managing epistemic and deontic status. Journal of Pragmatics, 90,12– 25.

Fitzgerald, P.E. & Ledar, I. (2010). On active listening in person-centred, solution-focused therapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3188-3198.

Forrester, M. (2017) Learning to use the word ‘know’. In A. Bateman & A. Church (Eds.) Children’s knowledge-in-interaction: Studies in conversation analysis. Singapore: Springer.

Garfinkel, H. & Sacks, H. (1970) On formal structures of practical actions. In J.C. McKinney & E.A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337-366). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

Hayano, K. (2012). Question design in conversation. In J.Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.) The handbook of conversation analysis (pp.395-414). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Heritage, J. & Watson, D.R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 123–162). New York: Irvington.

Holt, E. (2016). Laughter at last: Playfulness and laughter in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 100, 89-102.

Hutchby, I. (2005).‘Active listening’: Formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 303– 329.

Keel, S. (2015). Young children’s embodied pursuits of a response to their initial assessments, Journal of Pragmatics, 75(1), 1–24.

Kern, F. (2022) Embodiment. In A. Church & A. Bateman (Eds.) Talking with children: A handbook on interactions in early childhood education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knol, A.S.L., Huiskes, M., Koole, T., Meganck, R., Loeys, T. and Desmet, M. (2020). Reformulating and mirroring in psychotherapy: A conversation analytic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00318

Labov, W. & Fanshel,D. (1977) Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

MacMartin, C. (2008 ). Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 80– 99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Madill, A. (2015 ). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy process research. In O. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research (pp. 501– 515). Vienna, Austria: Springer.

Madill, A., Widdicombe, S., & Barkham, M. (2001). The potential of conversation analysis for psychotherapy research. Counseling Psychologist,29(3), 413– 443.

Muntigl, P. (2013). Resistance in couples counselling: Sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics,49(1), 18– 37.

Muntigl, P., & Horvath, A. O. (2014). The therapeutic relationship in action: How therapists and clients co-manage relational disaffiliation. Psychotherapy Research, 24(3), 327– 345.

Muntigl, P., Knight, N., Watkins, A., Horvath, A. O., & Angus, L. (2013 ). Active retreating: Person-centered practices to repair disaffiliation in therapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 53,1– 20.

Muntigl,P. & Zabala, L.H.  (2008)  Expandable resources: How clients get prompted to say more during psychotherapy,  Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 187–226.

Potter, J. and Hepburn, A. (2010). Putting aspiration into word: ‘laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action, Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6),1543–55.

Peräkylä, A.(2019). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy: Identifying transformative sequences, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 257-280.

Peräkylä, A. (2013). Conversation analysis in psychotherapy. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Handbook in conversation analysis (pp. 551– 574). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Peräkylä, A. (2011). After interpretation: Third-position utterances in psychoanalysis. Research on Language & Social Interaction,44(3), 288– 316.

Peräkylä, A. (2005). Patients’ responses to interpretations. A dialogue between conversation analysis and psycho-analytic theory. Communication & Medicine,2(2): 163– 176.

Peräkylä, A. (2004). Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: A conversation analytic view. Psychotherapy Research,14(3), 289– 307.

Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S., & Leudar, I. (2008a ). Analysing psychotherapy in practice. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I Leudar (Eds.),Conversation analysis and psychotherapy(pp. 5– 25). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S. & Leudar, I. (Eds.). (2008b). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Rae, J. (2008 ). Lexical substitution as a therapeutic resource. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 62– 79). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks. H., Schegloff, E.A. & Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.

Stivers, T. & Rossano, F. (2010), Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31.

Stokoe, E., Hepburn, A., & Antaki, C. (2012). Beware the “Loughborough School” of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 486–496.

Streeck, J. (1980). William Labov & David Fanshel, Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press, 1977. Language in Society, 9(1), 117-126. doi:10.1017/S0047404500007910

Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction. Talk & Text, 23(4), 573–606.

Vehviläinen, S., Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C. & Leuder, I. (2008) A review of the conversational practices of psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 26– 42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2010c). Misalignment as a therapeutic resource. Qualitative Research in Psychology,7(4), 299–315.

Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2011). Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 348–365.

Voutilainen, L., Rossano, F., & Peräkylä, A. (2018). Conversation analysis and psychotherapeutic change. In S.Pekarek-Doehler, J. Wagner & E. Gonzáles-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of socialinteraction (pp. 225–254). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Weiste, E., & Peräkylä, A. (2013). A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction,46(4), 299–321.

Weiste, E., Voutilainen, L., & Peräkylä, A. (2016). Epistemic asymmetries in psychotherapy interaction: Therapists’ practices for displaying access to clients’ inner experiences. Sociology of Health and Illness, 38(4), 645– 661.

Wynn,R. & Wynn,M. (2006). Empathy as an interactionally achieved phenomenon in psychotherapy: Characteristics of some conversational resources. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(9), 1385–1397.